CAPSLOCKIA

[Starry Sky]

 AND COLORFU L!

 

*WAVES TO DELTA* 

 

WHEN I FIRST JOINED CAPSLOCKIA, MY POSTS ALL LOOKED LIKE THIS1111 THIS IS A QUESTION//// IT LOOKED REALLY MESSY. I BECAME A RULE BREAKER

[paporomantic]

16 minutes ago, deltaX said:

YES, OFFICIALLY QUESTION MARKS ARE NOT ALLOWED

 

THERE SHOULD BE LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF THE QUESTION MARK IN GENERAL. TOO OFTEN, I SEE IT USED IN AN AFFIRMATIVE OR NEGATIVE SENTENCE THAT THE AUTHOR IS JUST NOT TOTALLY SURE OF. I WONDER WHERE THIS FASHION OF QUESTION MARK USE CAME FROM.

[Cassiopeia]

AND I WILL USE THE BIG DOT TOO•••

[Starry Sky]

I USE QUESTION MARKS LIKE THAT SOMETIMES. IT INDICATES TONE FOR ME AND IS HELPFUL WHEN I DON'T WANT WHAT I WROTE TO BE READ WRONG. 

 

AND USE THE |INE IN P|ACE OF THE 12TH |ETTER OF THE ENG|ISH A|PHABET

[Zema]

2 hours ago, aroMa(n)tisse said:

 

THERE SHOULD BE LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF THE QUESTION MARK IN GENERAL. TOO OFTEN, I SEE IT USED IN AN AFFIRMATIVE OR NEGATIVE SENTENCE THAT THE AUTHOR IS JUST NOT TOTALLY SURE OF. I WONDER WHERE THIS FASHION OF QUESTION MARK USE CAME FROM.

I AGREE! TOO OFTEN I SEE PEOPLE USE QUESTION MARKS WHEN THEY AREN'T EVEN ASKING A QUESTION! IT MAKES READING THEIR WRITING MORE DIFFICULT AS I KEEP ADDING THE INFLECTION TO SIGNIFY A QUESTION IN MY HEAD.  THEN THE VOICE IN MY HEAD STARTS TO SOUND ANNOYING. I HAVE NO IDEA IF I MADE ANY SENSE JUST THEN.

[RedNeko]

9 hours ago, aroMa(n)tisse said:

 

THERE SHOULD BE LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF THE QUESTION MARK IN GENERAL. TOO OFTEN, I SEE IT USED IN AN AFFIRMATIVE OR NEGATIVE SENTENCE THAT THE AUTHOR IS JUST NOT TOTALLY SURE OF. I WONDER WHERE THIS FASHION OF QUESTION MARK USE CAME FROM.

IT'S TO REFLECT SPOKEN ENGLISH SINCE SPOKEN AND WRITTEN VERSIONS OF A LANGUAGE AREN'T THE SAME. IT JUST MEANS PEOPLE ARE BEING CHATTY

[Cassiopeia]

On 2016. 06. 28. at 3:55 PM, aihpen said:

I GOT A "NEW" PHONE ("NEW" MEANING NOT AS OLD AS MY OTHER ONE, NOT ACTUALLY NEW) AND ALL THE EMOTICONS HERE SUDDENLY LOOK DIFFERENT  THE ONES THAT WE ADDED LATER ON () ARE ALL BLURRY,

I KNOW•••

THAT'S MY FAULT, I'M TRYING TO FIX IT. PIXEL ART IS HARD, AND SO IS TRYING TO MIMIC SOMEONE ELSE'S STYLE AND COLOURS WITHOUT THE PALETTES THEY USED•

I'LL TRY TO TINKER WITH IT LATER ON, I WANTED TO MAKE SOME NEW ONES ANYWAY•

 

13 hours ago, aroMa(n)tisse said:

 

THERE SHOULD BE LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF THE QUESTION MARK IN GENERAL. TOO OFTEN, I SEE IT USED IN AN AFFIRMATIVE OR NEGATIVE SENTENCE THAT THE AUTHOR IS JUST NOT TOTALLY SURE OF. I WONDER WHERE THIS FASHION OF QUESTION MARK USE CAME FROM.

 

iTS SARCASM AS WELL, WHEN THE AUTHOR PROMPTS THE READER TO QUESTION THE CONTENT•

[paporomantic]

42 minutes ago, Cassiopeia said:

iTS SARCASM AS WELL, WHEN THE AUTHOR PROMPTS THE READER TO QUESTION THE CONTENT•

 

THIS INFREQUENT USE IS QUITE VALID. HOWEVER, IF SOMEONE WRITES 'UM... HI[Q]' IN THE TITLE OF A WELCOME AREA THREAD, IT'S SURELY NOT SARCASM AND NOT A QUESTION.

 

4 hours ago, RedNeko said:

IT JUST MEANS PEOPLE ARE BEING CHATTY

 

IN MY IMPRESSION, IT USUALLY MEANS PEOPLE ARE BEING UNCONFIDENT AF 

 

[Zema]

49 minutes ago, Cassiopeia said:

I KNOW•••

THAT'S MY FAULT, I'M TRYING TO FIX IT. PIXEL ART IS HARD, AND SO IS TRYING TO MIMIC SOMEONE ELSE'S STYLE AND COLOURS WITHOUT THE PALETTES THEY USED•

I'LL TRY TO TINKER WITH IT LATER ON, I WANTED TO MAKE SOME NEW ONES ANYWAY•

BUT WHY DO YOU HAVE TO COPY THE ART STYLE OF THE ORIGINAL EMOTICONS[Q] IF YOU WANT TO MAKE EMOTICONS, WHY NOT MAKE THEM YOUR OWN[Q] IT'LL GIVE THIS SITE MORE ORIGINALITY AND IT'LL FEEL MORE... OURS, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. ANYWAY I'VE BEEN COMPILING A LIST OF EMOTICONS THAT PEOPLE IN CHAT HAVE SUGGESTED, SO IF YOU WANT ME TO SEND YOU THAT, I'D BE MORE THAN HAPPY TOO.

[Cassiopeia]

33 minutes ago, Zemaddog said:

BUT WHY DO YOU HAVE TO COPY THE ART STYLE OF THE ORIGINAL EMOTICONS[Q] IF YOU WANT TO MAKE EMOTICONS, WHY NOT MAKE THEM YOUR OWN[Q] IT'LL GIVE THIS SITE MORE ORIGINALITY AND IT'LL FEEL MORE... OURS, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. ANYWAY I'VE BEEN COMPILING A LIST OF EMOTICONS THAT PEOPLE IN CHAT HAVE SUGGESTED, SO IF YOU WANT ME TO SEND YOU THAT, I'D BE MORE THAN HAPPY TOO.

 

WELL I GUESS WE HAVE THAT ORIGINALITY NOW, AS THEY ARE SO BLOODY BLURRY ON THE PHONE...

ANYWAY.

 

YES PLEASE. ALL THE IDEAS.

AND NOT TO ME, TO THE GENERAL SUGGESTIONS FOLKS, SO PEOPLE CAN SEE THEM, DISCUSS THEM, AND TOGETHER WE CAN DECIDE WHAT WOULD BE NEEDED, WHAT WOULD PEOPLE ACTUALLY USE.

[Zema]

31 minutes ago, Cassiopeia said:

 

WELL I GUESS WE HAVE THAT ORIGINALITY NOW, AS THEY ARE SO BLOODY BLURRY ON THE PHONE...

ANYWAY.

 

YES PLEASE. ALL THE IDEAS.

AND NOT TO ME, TO THE GENERAL SUGGESTIONS FOLKS, SO PEOPLE CAN SEE THEM AND WE CAN DECIDE WHAT WOULD BE NEEDED, WHAT WOULD PEOPLE ACTUALLY USE.

I THOUGHT ABOUT POSTING IT IN GENERAL SITE SUGGESTIONS. HOWEVER, I FEEL THAT IT NEEDS ITS OWN THREAD, SO THAT PEOPLE CAN SUBMIT BOTH NEW EMOTICONS AS WELLS AS IDEAS FOR NEW EMOTICONS. I MIGHT GO DO THAT NOW.

 

EDIT: DONE

[owl]

SO MY FRIEND LOOKED AT MY STEAM PROFILE AND A FEW PEOPLE HAD COMMENTED SOMETHING LIKE "NICE GUY"

AND MY FRIEND WAS GOING "WELL THAT'S A BIT SEXIST" AND STUFF (WHICH I AGREE, IT IS 'CAUSE I NEVER SAID I WAS A GUY TO THESE PEOPLE)

BUT HE WAS GOING ON ABOUT "'CAUSE YOU'RE A GIRL" AND I WAS JUST SO CLOSE TO GOING "HAHAH NO. JUST NO."  

[RedNeko]

I ALWAYS ASSUME THAT PEOPLE ARE USING 'GUY' IN A GENDER-NEUTRAL WAY, BUT THEN THEY SAY "GUYS... AND GIRLS" WHICH REMINDS ME THAT OTHER PEOPLE DON'T.

[owl]

I GUESS DEPENDS HOW IT'S BEING USED, FOR ME AT LEAST

HEY GUYS/WHAT'S UP GUYS IS GENDER NEUTRAL BUT GENERALLY EVERYTHING ELSE IS MASCULINE LIKE "THAT GUY" OR "THOSE GUYS"

[Cassiopeia]

I STOPPED USING IT FOR THAT REASON. I'D USUALLY GO WITH "PEOPLE" OR "FOLKS"

 

ANYWAY, THE VIDEO GAMING SCENE CAN BE AWFULLY SEXIST SOMETIMES, THAT'S ALSO A REASON WHY I NEVER REALLY GOT INTO IT.

[Zema]

THE PAPOCALYPSE IS COMING! WE ALREADY HAVE 10 PEOPLE FOR OUR CAUSE! JOIN US! JOIN US! WE WILL YOU FOREVER AND EVER!

[DannyFenton123]

JOIN THE PAPOCALYPSE  

[Dodgypotato]

PAPOS FOR WORLD/GALAXY/UNIVERSE LEADER!

[Starry Sky]

OH SO THAT'S WHAT THAT IS!! COOL.

[ElizabethDewitt]

I AM JOINING THIS THREAD BC I LOVE SCREAMING AT PEOPLE OVER THE INTERNET WITH JOY 

[Zema]

7 hours ago, Starry Sky said:

OH SO THAT'S WHAT THAT IS!! COOL.

BEHOLD THE PAPOS THAT DANNY HAS MADE:

 

 

 

 

SOME OF THE PAPOS THAT OTHERS HAVE MADE:

 

 

THIS IS NOWHERE NEAR ALL THE PAPOS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE
 

 

 

AS WELL AS @brsajo'S FINE WORK IN MAKING NEW AND IMPROVED PAPOS. WORDS CANNOT DESCRIBE WHAT AN AMAZING JOB HE'S DONE.

 

WE NEED MORE PEOPLE FOR OUR CAUSE! ALL YOU NEED TO JOIN IS TO PICK A PAPO AND MAKE IT YOUR PROFILE PICTURE. OR BETTER YET, MAKE YOUR OWN PAPO!

[Starry Sky]

OOOOOOHH I SHALL MAKE MY OWN PAPO!!

 

LATER >.>

[Zema]

THANK YOU FOR JOINING THE PAPOCALYPSE @Starry Sky. YOUR PAPO PROFILE PICTURE IS AMAZING . MAY I ASK WHAT YOU CALL IT?

[Starry Sky]

49 minutes ago, Zemaddog said:

THANK YOU FOR JOINING THE PAPOCALYPSE @Starry Sky. YOUR PAPO PROFILE PICTURE IS AMAZING . MAY I ASK WHAT YOU CALL IT?

 

'TIS :FRUITYPAPO:

 

Spoiler

BEAUTIFUL.

 

 

 

I TOTALLY BORROWED BRSAJO'S BEAUTIFUL VECTOR.

 

EDIT: AM I THE ONLY ONE WHOSE SPOILERS DO THAT? ^^ DOES NO ONE ELSE SEE IT? IT EXTENDS FOREVER BELOW THE END OF THE SPOILER.

[Zema]

37 minutes ago, Starry Sky said:

 TOTALLY BORROWED BRSAJO'S BEAUTIFUL VECTOR.

NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.

 

37 minutes ago, Starry Sky said:

EDIT: AM I THE ONLY ONE WHOSE SPOILERS DO THAT? ^^ DOES NO ONE ELSE SEE IT? IT EXTENDS FOREVER BELOW THE END OF THE SPOILER.

I HAVE HAD ISSUES WITH THE SPOILERS BUT NOT WHAT YOU'VE EXPERIENCED. THIS ISSUE I HAVE WITH SPOILERS IS THAT IT WILL DOUBLE THE SPACE BETWEEN PARAGRAPHS (I.E. WHEN I PRESS ENTER) AND I HAVE NO IDEA WHY AND IT REALLY BUGS ME.